Archive for September, 2008

No Meat, No Good

September 30, 2008
Greeting sign at Hermans

Greeting sign at Hermans

Vegetarianism has come a long way recently. Once considered only the domain of hippies, it is now much more widespread and accepted. This is a good thing.

I have a conflicting view on being a vegetarian: I support the ideology, but I also just love meat! This puts me in an awkward place which I feel a moral twinge of guilt about sometimes. To date I have not had too many problems suppressing my conscience and justifying my carnivorous ways though – even if only to myself.

Hermans Salad Bar

Hermans Salad Bar

One of the reasons I continue to eat meat-based dishes is because often the alternatives are bland and boring. Often the vegetarian dishes at restaurants seem like a bit of an after thought – something to satisfy the people that come to dine with the ‘real’ customers – not unlike a ‘kids menu’.

If vegetarian fans/chefs can produce dishes that taste better than meat based alternatives then I am sure the popularity would slowly rise. I do not mean suddenly there would be thousands of vegetarian converts, just that people would choose to eat vegetarian dishes more often – or go to vegetarian restaurants.

There are of course a number of good reasons to become vegetarian eat more vegetarian dishes. Unless the meat-less dishes taste good though I doubt I will be able to convince you to do so.

Many of the vegetarian dishes I have had tried do not even come close in taste to the meat-based alternatives. However, a restaurant I went to recently that served numerous amazing vegetarian dishes was Hermans in Stockholm. To be fair, it is a vegetarian restaurant – they have no meat dishes – and after sampling a few mouthfuls I was not craving meat at all. When I went there was Lasagna, Nachos, Stews, as well as really good salads (and not just a vegetable or two cut up in a bowl) available. All of them were excellent – and a lot better for you than the meat based alternatives I would imagine.

They serve them all in true Smorgasbord fashion – which although requires some self restraint to avoid overeating – does allow you to try many dishes. Compared to all the other restaurants I went to in Stockholm, this is the one I will definitely be going back to.

Gebrselassie 2:03.58 – New World Record

September 29, 2008

Haile Gebrselassie, a man I have written about before, broke the World Record for the Marathon yesterday in Berlin. If you want a full analysis of the race (written in real time no less) go here. 2:03.58 (or 2:03.59 depending on the source) is the first time someone has gone under 2:04 for the distance.

Obviously here ran very fast, but one split that is amazing to me was the distance between the 35km and 40km marks, which he covered in 14.29. Anyone who have ever run a 5km knows how fast this is, but after 35 previous kilometers at World Record pace it is simply phenomenal.

Build the Cycle Lanes and the Cyclists will come

September 25, 2008

If you build it, he will come – Shoeless Joe in Field of Dreams.

When it comes to Cycle Lanes, what comes first: the Lanes themselves, or lots of people using bikes?

In some European cities over 40% of urban journeys are made on a bike. Can this all be attributed to cultural differences? Or are people from Holland and Denmark more likely to bike simply because they live in compact cities, with no hills?

Bike Pump in Stockholm

Bike Pump in Stockholm

But it is not only the existence of the lanes that differs Europe from many other places. It is the facilities that go along with the cycling. Like bike pumps in the city (right next to the cycle lanes, meaning no more dirty looks from service station attendants while you free load some air), and bike racks everywhere so you can lock up your bike and go into shops or work, or meet friends at a cafe, without having to tie your bike up to a power poll, or 1km away. The net result: everyone seems to bike here. Young children, men in suits, and females dressed up off to work – something I can never recall seeing in Wellington.

As John Bucher puts it:

You don´t have to be Lance Armstrong to get on a bike

So why do we predominately only see young men on bikes in most New Zealand Cities? The reason is safety. This is why a majority of elderly, women, and children do not and/or are not allowed to cycle. So how can we make cycling more safe, and thereby more attractive? Wearing helmets would be a start right? Maybe not. In Denmark and Holland wearing a helmet is optional, and I can tell you in Scandinavia very few people do. Yet these places have much lower fatality rates from cycling than other countries where wearing helmets is law. A point supported by data from John Bucher in this lecture. Also, it is interesting to note that approximately 1 in 1,000 cyclists have an ´on-road injury crash´ every year, compared to 3 in every 1,000 car users.

At first I thought the demand from cyclists would have to come before City Planners took note. But after doing some research I realise this is not the case. In fact it is outright wrong.

Cycle Lane in Stockholm

Cycle Lane in Stockholm

Cities that have built bike lanes and supporting infrastructure first, to facilitate cycling, have seen huge increases in cycling - some a 10 fold increase in fact, in a short amount of time.

It is imperative that any idea is Economically, and Socially attractive and sustainable before any local body is going to pick it up and run with it. Luckily cycling is both. There are a few organisations and people on the case. I only hope they have some success. The CAN is another one.

The Harbour Bridge and Ngauranga to Petone route seem to be two commonly quoted routes in Auckland and Wellington respectively that need cycle lanes. The reality is we need to be thinking much bigger than simply these two routes. I hope they both get the attention they need, but that they are the catalyst for many more resources to be put towards cycling in New Zealand.

Can Bolt run 9.61?

September 23, 2008

Cool video and interesting analysis done on the Beijing Olympics by my favorite blog right now. Specifically they look at what time Bolt would have run in the 100m Final if he did not slow down. Well worth a read, especially if you did not realise that in the 100m the winner is not always the fastest person, but the one that slows down the least.

Beijing (Revised) Medal Count

September 1, 2008

Does a Gold Medal at the Olympics in Track and Field ‘count’ for as much as a Gold Medal in the Synchronised Swimming? How about a Gold in the Women’s 100m versus a Bronze in Taekwondo Women under 49kg? On the current medal tables used by the media and the IOC the the answer to both questions is clearly yes.

Counting only Total, and Total Gold Medals to me seems a little archaic. The first especially. I mean, can you honestly tell me who finished third in the 100m final (let alone the under 49kg TKD)? It seems very strange to me that under the ‘Total Medals’ scoring systems a bronze is worth as much as a gold, when we all know it is not.

But it does not have to be this way. Using a scientifically sophicitaded formula I have made up formulated of giving 10 times the value to Track and Field medals than all other sports, because lets face it, it is what the Olympics is all about, and 5 points for gold, 3 for silver, 1 for bronze to all medals, I believe we can really see who the top performing countries are*. The result:

  Total Gold rank Total Medals rank Simpson Method rank
USA 36 2 330 1 850 1
Russian Fed. 23 3 206 3 726 2
Kenya 5 14 44 18 484 3
Jamaica 6 13 41 20 451 4
China 51 1 346 2 346 5
Ethiopia 4 16 25 26 275 6
Great Britain 19 4 149 4 269 7
Australia 14 6 132 5 252 8
Belarus 4 16 45 13 215 9
 Cuba 2 28 54 12 184 10
Ukraine 7 10 65 10 175 11
Italy 8 9 80 9 140 12
Germany 16 5 125 6 135 13
France 7 10 100 7 130 14
Poland 3 19 34 21 114 15
Norway 3 19 32 21 112 16
 Korea 13 7 103 8 103 17
Brazil 3 19 35 17 85 18
Japan 9 8 73 11 83 19
New Zealand 3 19 23 24 83 19
Romania 4 16 26 25 76 21
Czech Republic 3 19 24 28 74 22
Slovakia 3 19 22 28 72 23
Spain 5 14 58 14 58 24
Canada 3 19 48 14 58 24
Netherlands 7 10 54 16 54 26
Hungary 3 19 32 21 32 27
Kazakhstan 2 28 29 19 29 28
Denmark 2 28 19 26 19 29
 Georgia 3 19 18 28 18 30

The big losers are Germany, China, Korea, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Romania, and Canada who all obviously get many of their medals from non-Track and Field sports. The big winners: Kenya, Belarus, and Ethopia. I would be interested to know how much these later countries spend on their elite sportsmen. I doubt very much it is close to the AUS$40 million per gold Australia ‘paid’. This is the reason some people include a GDP factor also.

But even this is not a fair result as it does not take into account the population pool of these countries. Is it really fair to compare China with Jamica? Not really. Therefore we need to adjust these results to reflect per capita. And so the final rankings of the 2008 Summer Olympics are:

  Total RANK
 Jamaica 1608,4 1
Norway 234,5 2
Belarus 221,9 3
New Zealand 194,5 4
Cuba 161,5 5
Kenya 139,4 6
Slovakia 133,9 7
 Australia 117,9 8
Czech Republic 71,1 9
Russian Fed. 51,1 10
Great Britain 46,4 11
 Georgia 38,9 12
Ukraine 37,7 13
Ethiopia 35,1 14
Denmark 34,7 15
Romania 34,2 16
Netherlands 32,9 17
Hungary 31,9 18
Poland 29,9 19
USA 27,9 20
 Korea 27,0 21
Italy 23,5 22
France 20,2 23
Kazakhstan 19,1 24
Canada 17,4 25
Germany 16,4 26
Spain 12,8 27
Japan 6,5 28
Brazil 4,5 29
China 2,6 30

No personal offence was intended towards Dalia Contreras Rivero in the writing of this blog. Congratulations to her from everyone at KitchenPT.com.

 * I only used the top 30 countries on the current medal count system


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.